Yet again incosistency here from the police/CPS. The guy on Oakwood Ave charged with “going equipped”. When we disturbed two lads breaking into a neighbour’s shed 18 months ago, they were caught by the police and one was still carrying a screwdriver. Despite 2 statements that we had witnessed them and disturbed them, and being prepared to identify at least one of them, there was “insufficient evidence” to charge them. This is NOT on.
Does no-one check these reports for typos,grammar and punctuation,or is this toomuch trouble?
Yet again incosistency here from the police/CPS. The guy on Oakwood Ave charged with “going equipped”. When we disturbed two lads breaking into a neighbour’s shed 18 months ago, they were caught by the police and one was still carrying a screwdriver. Despite 2 statements that we had witnessed them and disturbed them, and being prepared to identify at least one of them, there was “insufficient evidence” to charge them. This is NOT on.